Entries in pipeline (4)


Keystone to Re-Apply for Permit to Build Controversial Pipeline

ABC/ Fred Watkins(WASHINGTON) -- House Speaker John Boehner criticized President Obama Monday for his comments praising TransCanada Corporation’s continued efforts to build a 1,661-mile, $7.6 billion Keystone XL oil pipeline from the tar sands of Alberta, Canada, through the U.S. to the oil refineries in the Gulf of Mexico.

The company on Monday announced it would try to proceed with one portion of the pipeline immediately, while re-submitting its application for the part the Obama administration has refused to approve.

“The President is so far on the wrong side of the American people that he’s now praising the company’s decision to start going around him,” Boehner said in a statement to ABC News.

Boehner said the president “can’t have it both ways. If the President thinks this project is good for America, he knows how to make it happen right away. Until he does, he’s just standing in the way of getting it done.”

The political twists and turns of the TransCanada Corporation’s Keystone XL oil pipeline have woven their way through the debate about energy policy in the past six months. In November, the State Department announced it would delay a decision on the proposed Keystone project to allow for further study of the environmental impact along its 1,700-mile route. The president was stuck between environmentalists and many residents of Nebraska, who opposed the project due to concerns about how it would impact its water supply, and labor unions and others who heralded the jobs the pipeline would create.

TransCanada has said the project would create “more than 20,000 direct jobs and 118,000 spin-off jobs during construction.”

Last November, President Obama told ABC’s Omaha, Nebraska affiliate, KETV, that “folks in Nebraska like all across the country aren’t going to say to themselves, ‘We’ll take a few thousand jobs if it means our kids are potentially drinking water that would damage their health. We don’t want, for example, aquifers to be adversely affected. Folks in Nebraska obviously would be directly impacted.”

In December, House Republicans inserted into a bill extending the payroll tax cut, a priority of the president’s, a requirement that the president officially make a decision on the pipeline within two months. The president did so in January, rejecting the project because of the “rushed and arbitrary deadline insisted on by Congressional Republicans” which he said “prevented a full assessment of the pipeline's impact, especially the health and safety of the American people, as well as our environment.” Republicans have seized on the issue as an example of the president putting the environment ahead of jobs.

On Monday, TransCanada announced it would seek approval for one part of the pipeline, the part leading from Cushing, Oklahoma, to Texas refineries in the Gulf. The company said constructing that part of the pipeline would create roughly 4,000 jobs, both in construction and in supporting those workers, and cost $2.3 billion. The company said it hoped this smaller portion would be working by 2013.

In a statement, White House press secretary Jay Carney said President Obama “welcomes” the news. “As the President made clear in January, we support the company’s interest in proceeding with this project,” he said, “which will help address the bottleneck of oil in Cushing that has resulted in large part from increased domestic oil production, currently at an eight year high. Moving oil from the Midwest to the world-class, state-of-the-art refineries on the Gulf Coast will modernize our infrastructure, create jobs, and encourage American energy production. We look forward to working with TransCanada to ensure that it is built in a safe, responsible and timely manner, and we commit to take every step possible to expedite the necessary Federal permits.”

The company also contacted the U.S. State Department indicating it would re-apply for the rest of the project.  Carney said, “As we made clear, the president’s decision in January in no way prejudged future applications. We will ensure any project receives the important assessment it deserves, and will base a decision to provide a permit on the completion of that review.”

At the press briefing, Carney said that the president’s rejection of the Keystone Pipeline “had nothing to do with the merits of a pipeline proposal, it was simply that, because of the decision by Republicans to play politics with this, it forced him -- forced the administration to deny the permit request because there wasn't even a pipeline route identified.”

Environmental groups assailed the group’s announcement as “a ploy to avoid a review that will show how the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline will raise U.S. oil prices, send tar sands overseas, endanger U.S. homes and waters, and contribute to worsening climate change,” as Natural Resources Defense Council International Program director Susan Casey-Lefkowitz wrote in a blog post.

Last week, the Pew Research Center indicated that 63 percent of the public had heard at least a little about the Keystone project. Of those individuals, 66 percent believe that the government should approve the project.

Copyright 2012 ABC News Radio


Senate GOP Renews Push for Keystone XL Oil Pipeline

ABC News(WASHINGTON) -- Senate Republicans on Monday renewed their push for the Keystone XL oil pipeline project to move forward, despite President Obama’s rejection of the controversial proposal earlier this month.

“It’s time to make a decision. It’s time to move forward,” Sen. John Hoeven, R-North Dakota said on the Senate floor. “Clearly we can make this decision. Clearly after more than three years of study it doesn't make sense to not move forward. Particularly when we're talking about tens of thousands of jobs today we need, not only will it not cost our federal government revenue, it will generate hundreds of millions in revenue back to local, state, and federal government.”

The legislation, introduced on the floor of the Senate on Monday, would start construction of the project immediately but take “as much time” as needed to reroute the route through Nebraska, one of the most contentious parts of the planned route.

The legislation would move without the president, which Hoeven explained on the Senate floor is covered by invoking the Commerce Clause of the Constitution.

“It is time for Congress to exercise its authority again for the good of our economy -- for the good of our economy and for the good of our country,” Hoeven said.

If passed in the House and Senate the bill still could be vetoed by the president.

The legislation has the support of 44 Senators but from only one Democrat, Sen. Joe Manchin, D-West Virginia.

Copyright 2012 ABC News Radio


Obama to Be Involved in Keystone XL Pipeline Decision

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images(OMAHA, Neb.) -- President Obama says he will be closely involved in the decision on whether to approve the controversial Keystone XL oil pipeline that has pitted two of his key constituencies, labor unions and environmental groups, against each other.

In an interview Tuesday with Omaha, Neb., ABC affiliate KETV, the president suggested he will personally weigh the economic and environmental impact of the proposed pipeline before offering his input. The administration had previously said the matter would be a State Department decision.

“The State Department’s in charge of analyzing this, because there’s a pipeline coming in from Canada,” Obama said. “They’ll be giving me a report over the next several months, and, you know, my general attitude is, what is best for the American people? What’s best for our economy both short term and long term? But also, what’s best for the health of the American people?”

The $7 billion pipeline would run from the tar sands of Alberta, Canada, to refineries on the Texas Gulf Coast, crossing through six states, including Nebraska.

TransCanada, the company seeking administration approval for the deal, says construction would create as many as 20,000 new jobs. Environmentalists claim the pipeline would expose broad swaths of the country to potential oil spills and that the jobs created would only be temporary.

Copyright 2011 ABC News Radio


Ruptured ExxonMobil Pipeline Spills Oil into Yellowstone River

ExxonMobil(BILLINGS, Mont.) -- A ruptured ExxonMobil Pipeline Company (EMPCo) pipeline reportedly sent oil gushing into the Yellowstone River on Saturday.

Company officials say early Saturday morning it was discovered that an “undetermined amount” of crude oil was released into the river from an EMPCo pipeline.

“EMPCo deeply regrets this release and is working hard with local emergency authorities to mitigate the impacts of this release on the surrounding communities and to the environment,” the company said in a press release.

The company said the 12-inch crude pipeline that broke runs from Silver Tip, Mont. to Billings, Mont., and the ruptured line has since been shut down. However, officials could not say what caused the spill.

“At this early stage, we have no information on the cause of the incident, and we are working to determine the amount of oil released,” the company said in its press release.

“We recognize the seriousness of this incident and are working hard to address it. Our principal focus is on protecting the safety and health of the public and our employees. We will, of course, also begin a thorough investigation of the cause of this unfortunate event.”

EMPCo says it has notified the appropriate state and federal authorities, and has also set up a claims number (1-888-382-0043) to assist anyone who might have been affected by the oil spill.

Copyright 2011 ABC News Radio

ABC News Radio