(WASHINGTON) -- President Obama wants to pay for his $447 billion American Jobs Act with a mix of so-called revenue enhancers, mostly by taxing the wealthy.
The president said Monday he hopes the special Congressional super committee already charged with making $1.5 trillion in cuts to reduce the deficit by Nov. 23 will "overachieve" and consider his proposals to pay for the plan, which is intended to stimulate job creation. Republican reception was cool, with the party's top leaders saying tax increases are unacceptable and job-killing.
Steven Leslie, lead analyst for financial services at the Economist Intelligence Unit, part of the Economist Group, said the measures announced Monday had already been debated before August's deficit reduction plan.
"These are almost exactly like the ones Obama proposed a month ago: shift the tax burden to the wealthy people and close some of these loopholes on corporate airplanes," Leslie said.
The plan includes new limits on deductions for income over $250,000 which the White House says could raise $400 billion over 10 years, oil and gas tax measures which would raise $40 billion, and limiting tax deductions for corporate jets which could raise $3 billion.
Office of Management and Budget Chair Jack Lew on Monday also described changes to the taxation of carried interest, raising $18 billion from the income of hedge fund and private equity managers.
Billionaire Warren Buffett previously criticized the current policy which he said allows his secretary to pay more in taxes than he does.
The committee, which met for the first time on Sept. 8, holds its first hearing Tuesday. At the hearing, Congressional Budget office director Doug Elmendorf will testify on "The History and Drivers of Our Nation's Debt and Its Threats."
Cato Institute economist Dan Mitchell said the measures were "repackaged" from previous White House proposals, like Dr. Seuss' Green Eggs and Ham. He said he doubts the measures will effectively stimulate the economy.
"As they say in the children's book, 'I do not like them in a house. I do not like them with a mouse. I do not like them here or there. I do not like them anywhere,'" Mitchell said.
Mitchell said the most newsworthy announcement on Monday was that the president was targeting itemized deductions, as opposed to increasing the marginal tax rate. He said most economists across an ideological spectrum agree doing the latter would create the most damage per dollar raised because it affects the incentive to earn additional income.
Copyright 2011 ABC News Radio