SEARCH

Entries in Fish pedicures (2)

Wednesday
Jan162013

Are Fish Pedicures a Health Hazard? Arizona Woman Defends Business

Michael Temchine/For The Washington Post via Getty Images(PHOENIX) -- Fish pedicures -- in which you sit in a salon with your feet in water while small fish nibble away dead, callused skin -- may be a growing trend overseas, but not in the United States.  Now, an Arizona woman who started offering fish pedicures is going to court to defend her business.

Cindy Vong opened a fish spa in the Phoenix suburbs as part of her nail salon in 2008 and spent $50,000, seeing it as an opportunity to expand her business.  Six months later, the Arizona Board of Cosmetology forced her to stop, arguing that the fish, used for skin exfoliation, could not be sanitized between uses.  Vong sued for the right to reopen the spa.

“She hasn’t violated any law, she hasn’t done anything wrong, she’s being an enterprising woman,” argued Darcy Olsen, the president of the Goldwater Institute, which says it defends people’s liberties from government intrusion and decided to take on Vong’s case.  “A threat to her business is a threat to every American business, and that’s why we’re fighting the case.”

Opening statements in the trial began Monday in Maricopa County Superior Court.  According to Olsen, the cosmetology board argued that the fish were a tool, and “every tool that comes in contact with a client in Arizona needs to be disinfected or thrown away.”

Olsen said these are unreasonable guidelines.  He conceded that “you can’t disinfect a fish with Clorox bleach,” but said Vong’s constitutional rights were violated and the board “could have come up with an alternative set of regulations.”

“Basically, it’s a 14th amendment issue,” said Olsen.  “In America you have the right to pursue an honest living as long as you’re not endangering the public.  She has the right to operate this business and the government does not have any right to shut her down.”

Fish spas overseas most often use Garra rufa fish, native to the Middle East, to nibble away dead skin on people’s feet.  According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, at least 10 states have banned fish pedicures, citing the risk of infection.

Last year, ABC News reported the fish “may carry bacteria responsible for a variety of dangerous skin and soft tissue infections, British scientists reported.”  

The CDC says on its website that it is ” not aware of any published reports on illnesses resulting from fish pedicures.  Nail salon foot baths, however, have caused outbreaks of nontuberculous mycobacterial infections that left infected pedicure customers with boils and scars.”

Vong has argued the practice does not pose any health risks and said she did not receive complaints from customers.  Olsen said Vong had to lay off three employees and claims she lost a popular part of her practice.

She is not looking for any monetary damages, said Olsen.  “She just wants to be able to operate her business,” Olsen added.

Lawyers for and members of the Arizona Board of Cosmetology could not be reached for comment.

Copyright 2013 ABC News Radio

Wednesday
May162012

New Report Says Fish Pedicures May Carry Dangerous Bacteria

Michael Temchine/For The Washington Post via Getty Images(ATLANTA) -- The tiny toothless carp that nibble away dead, calloused skin from the feet of salon customers undergoing fish pedicures may carry bacteria responsible for a variety of dangerous skin and soft tissue infections, British scientists reported today.

The threat has remained largely theoretical ever since a spa in Alexandria, Va., brought the fishy foot treatments to U.S. shores in 2008 as a replacement for the razors typically used to scrape dead skin from calloused toes and heels. More than 6,000 patrons flocked to the spa in its first five months for a fish pedicure. But U.S. and British health officials continue to warn that anyone with open sores or skin cuts, an underlying medical condition such as diabetes or an immune system compromised by AIDS, cancer or advanced age should steer clear of a fish pedicure.

"The most important thing to stress at this point is that the U.K. Health Protection Authority considers the human health risks to be very low, and we would not want your readers to be unduly alarmed by our findings," David W. Verner-Jeffreys, lead author of the new report, told ABC News Tuesday.

Scientists began to get indications of the kinds of microbes that could be bathing fish spa patrons' feet in April 2011, when British authorities investigated a reported bacterial outbreak among 6,000 Garra rufa fish imported from Indonesia to British salons and pedicure spas. Tests revealed the fish had been infected with Streptococcus agalactiae, group B Streptococcus, bacteria that can cause pneumonia and serious infections of the bones, joints and blood in people of all ages and life-threatening infections in newborns.

The bacteria findings appear Wednesday in Emerging Infectious Diseases, a journal published by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, which has been monitoring health effects associated with fish pedicures.

More than 10 states have banned the practice for a variety of reasons, the CDC said, including the inability to sufficiently clean fish pedicure tubs between patrons; the impossibility of disinfecting or sanitizing live fish; regulations that specify fish in a salon must be kept in an aquarium, and a humanitarian justification that to entice the fish to feed on dead human skin, they must be starved, "which might be considered animal cruelty."

In the United States, "there have been no published reports to date regarding illness from fish pedicures," the CDC said in a June 2011 document. "However, fish-free foot-baths in nail salons have been implicated in several outbreaks of nontuberculous mycobacterial infections, including the species Mycobacterium abscessus and M. fortuitum," which have left customers with boils and scars.

Copyright 2012 ABC News Radio







ABC News Radio