SEARCH

Entries in Elena Kagan (2)

Sunday
Jan012012

Chief Justice Roberts Responds to Judicial Ethics Critics

iStockphoto/Thinkstock(WASHINGTON) -- Chief Justice John Roberts issued a ringing endorsement Saturday night of his colleagues’ ability to determine when they should step down from a case because of a conflict of interest.

“I have complete confidence in the capability of my colleagues to determine when recusal is warranted. ” Roberts wrote in his annual report on the Federal Judiciary. “They are jurists of exceptional integrity and experience whose character and fitness have been examined through a rigorous appointment and confirmation process.”

Roberts took the unusual step of devoting the majority of his annual report to the issue of judicial ethics, noting that he wanted to address issues that had “recently drawn public attention.”

In the past several months members of Congress and public interest groups on both sides of the ideological spectrum have demanded  that Justices -- with potentially opposing views -- recuse themselves from hearing the blockbuster health care case at the end of March.

Conservatives have focused on Justice Elena Kagan, arguing that her previous job of Solicitor General in the Obama administration should disqualify her from hearing the challenge to the law. During her confirmation hearings Kagan testified, under oath, that she had not played a substantial role in the case. Liberal groups have targeted Justice Clarence Thomas because of his wife’s ties to a group opposing the health care law.

Recusal issues are left up to the individual Justice, and neither Thomas nor Kagan has indicated that they will not participate fully in the case.

Robert’s reports comes at a time the court is under intense scrutiny by some presidential candidates, and before it hears several hot button cases—health care, immigration, voter’s rights–that will be decided in the heart of the next election campaign.

“[A]t the end of the day,” Roberts writes, “no compilation of ethical rules can guarantee integrity. Judges must exercise both constant vigilance and good judgment to fulfill the obligations they have all taken since the beginning of the Republic.”

Copyright 2012 ABC News Radio

Monday
Oct042010

Kagan Takes the Bench as Supreme Court Term Begins

Photo Courtesy - ABC News(WASHINGTON) -- A new Supreme Court term got underway Monday with Justice Elena Kagan, in her first appearance on the bench, asking several questions about a technical case involving bankruptcy law.

For the first time in history, three women -- Justices Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg -- sat on the bench, each one participating lively.

Kagan took Sotomayor's old seat on the far right of the bench from a spectator's perspective. The addition of a new justice changes the court's seating arrangement, as justices with the most seniority flank the chief justice, who sits at the center.

When the first case ended, Kagan left the courtroom, as she had recused herself from the second case. Kagan has so far recused herself from about half the cases -- 52 so far -- because she dealt with them in some capacity while serving as solicitor general.

Copyright 2010 ABC News Radio







ABC News Radio