SEARCH
« Obama Wants FBI Director Mueller for Two More Years | Main | John McCain: Torture Did Not Help Hunt for Osama Bin Laden »
Thursday
May122011

Ron Paul Would Not Have Ordered Osama Bin Laden Killing

Jason Merritt/Getty Images(DES MOINES, Iowa) -- Rep. Ron Paul took an interesting position for a likely presidential candidate Tuesday -- he explained to an Iowa radio station why he would not have ordered the killing of Osama bin Laden.

“It was absolutely not necessary and I think respect for the rule of law, international law -- what if he’d been in a hotel in London?" Paul asked. "We wanted to keep it secret. Would we have sent the helicopters into London? Because they were afraid the information would get out. No you don’t want to do that.”

Paul said the U.S. government should have worked with the Pakistani government, respecting borders, to get at Osama bin Laden.

He pointed to other terror suspects who were captured and tried. Paul pointed to the arrest of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, widely accepted as the 9/11 mastermind, by Pakistani authorities. Mohammed now sits at Guantanamo Bay awaiting trial by a military tribunal.

Paul also pointed to the capture and trial of “Blind Sheikh” Omar Abdel Rahman, who was arrested in Brooklyn and tried and convicted in U.S. court.

“What’s wrong with that?” Paul asked. “Why can’t we work with the government?”

Copyright 2011 ABC News Radio

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>






ABC News Radio