SEARCH

Entries in Minority (2)

Saturday
May122012

Elizabeth Warren Controversy: How Do Law Schools Make Hiring Decisions Anyway?

Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg via Getty Images(NEW YORK) -- Massachusetts Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren has had a rough couple of weeks on the campaign trail as questions continue to swirl about why she listed herself as a minority in law school directories  in the 1980s and ’90s.

Warren,62, has maintained that she identified herself as a minority to meet other people like  herself. Warren is one-thirty-second Native American, genealogists said. Republicans have accused Warren of using this minority status to receive special treatment in hiring.

But controversy around Warren has  raised another question: What exactly does go  into law school faculty hiring decisions?

Law schools have changed drastically from the 1970s and ’80s, when Warren was beginning her career. The field  is now much more constrained, but during the early days of Warren’s career, law schools were frequently looking to find rising stars.

“Schools were typically searching both broadly for people that they were predicting would be excellent scholars and teachers,” said Susan Westerberg Prager, CEO and executive director of the Association of American Law Schools. “They were also searching in whatever specific subject matter areas they had needs in.”

Prager, a former dean of UCLA law school, and one of the first female law school deans in the country, said schools were also looking to hire more women.

“Until changes began in the ’70s, to say the field was dominantly male doesn’t even make it apparent at how dominantly it was male,” Prager said.

Prager, who said she was a registered independent, acknowledged that racial diversity had also traditionally been an important law school hiring consideration.

“A number of schools, beginning in the late ’60s, became concerned about diversifying their faculty, both with respect to gender and race,” she said, but the hiring criteria differed from school to school.

Those familiar with law school hiring said that in general, entry level hiring decisions were likely to be based more on the candidate’s  academic background, whereas later on, particularly when it came to tenured positions,  the body of work was most important.

“By then you see a body of work where you’re acknowledged by peers in the field,” Prager said.

“Every school that aspires to be more and more recognized …  that’s a very big factor. The entry level hiring-people are making predictions about how will this person pan out? But they have the years to tenure to decide whether they’re developing well, and evaluating teaching and scholarship.”

Warren graduated from Rutgers School of Law- Newark in 1976. While at Rutgers, she served as editor of the law review.  Prager said  that she did not know Warren, but that she had heard through colleagues over the years  that Warren was a star in her field.

“My predecessor at UCLA, I can remember him talking about Warren, telling me about what a star she was,” Prager said. “This is long before this would have crept into any popular acknowledgement. She was well established from a young age.”

Warren was listed as a minority in AALS directories from 1986-1995. Prager said that the means of collecting data had changed over the years, and different schools had handled data collecting differently, making it difficult to determine when and where Warren might have checked herself as minority.

“AALS collects information for the directory from deans of AALS member schools and from faculty, and, as you can imagine, how the organization has collected this information has changed over the years,” Prager said.

“The hiring picture is often highly influenced by what people need to staff in their programs and the accomplishments of the people they’re looking at,” she said. “The quality of teaching and research are the dominant factors in these decisions.”

Copyright 2012 ABC News Radio

Wednesday
Jan052011

Filibuster Reform Fight Unfolds in Senate

Photo Courtesy - Getty Images(WASHINGTON) -- With the Democrats’ majority in the Senate Wednesday dwindling from 58 seats to 53 as the 112th Congress kicked off, they wasted no time in embarking on an effort to change Senate rules to make it harder for the minority party to filibuster legislation.

“The United States Senate must solve problems, not create them,” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said in a speech on the chamber’s floor.

“No one can deny that the filibuster has been used for purely political reasons, reasons far beyond those for which this protection was invented and intended.”

Reid, noting that the last session of Congress saw nearly as many filibusters as the 1920s, 1930s, 1940s, 1950s, 1960s, and half the 1970s combined, said the filibuster has been “used and abused gratuitously.”

“Many of these recent filibusters were terribly unproductive,” said Reid, citing that many bills that broke through the Senate’s 60-vote threshold ultimately passed overwhelmingly and sometimes unanimously.

Leading the push for filibuster reform is Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa. Harkin wants to amend Senate rules to allow a decreasing majority of senators to end debate on a bill.

As it stands now, Rule XXII requires that three-fifths of the chamber -- in other words, 60 members -- must back a bill in order to end debate and move to a final vote, so a group of minority senators can effectively stop a bill by voting against it and preventing it from passing the 60-vote hurdle, a move known as a modern-day filibuster.

Under Harkin’s proposal, if a bill does not get 60 votes to end debate, another vote could take place two days later, requiring 57 votes. If the bill still failed to get past that vote, then a third vote needing 54 votes could take place after two more days. Finally, a fourth vote, with only 51 votes needed, would take place after another two-day wait.

“275 filibusters in four years is not just a cold statistic. It represents the minority blocking measures sometimes -- not all the time -- but sometimes that enjoy broad support among the American people. In the last Congress, the filibuster was used to kill many bills that enjoyed majority and often bipartisan support,” Harkin said.

“This should not be a partisan issue,” Sen. Tom Udall, D-N.M., said. “We know both sides have abused the rules. Now is the time to work together to fix them.”

But GOP leaders show no signs of going along with the Democrats’ efforts. The Senate’s top Republican Mitch McConnell Wednesday denounced the filibuster reform plans as “a bad idea.”

The Senate’s fight over filibuster reform is not set to take center stage until later this month, since lawmakers are set to recess later this week until Jan. 24. At that time, Reid may have figured out a way to work out a deal on reform that is palatable to Republicans -- or he may have decided to try to pass the reforms with a simple majority vote using the so-called “Constitutional option.”

Copyright 2011 ABC News Radio







ABC News Radio